The way this sentence is stated made me feel as if the exhibit would credit this act to be humane and was what revolutionized weapon technology. I feel like this quote and many others in the document can be perceived as biased. The document stated, “the exhibition would conclude by noting the debatable character of the atomic bombings, as well as their important role as one of the starting points of the nuclear age and Cold War”. When I read the second concept document I felt totally different. This made me feel confident that the museum would display actual facts and nothing would be biased. It stated in the article that, “the primary goal of this exhibition will be to encourage visitors to make a thoughtful and balances re-examination on the atomic bombings in the light of the political and military factors leading to the decision to use the bomb, the human suffering experiences by people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the long-term implications of the events…”. I read through the first document and it appeared to have little bias toward any side, the sides being the Japanese or the Americans. ![]() What really struck me as I read through some of these websites were the first two concept documents for the Enola Gay exhibit.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |